Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoDQ80Himyhpwu14FUE4UezCq7biOCGAY6DcVBjd4b34sA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:13 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 9:04 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 10:43:30AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> > > Thank you for updating the patch. The v2 patch looks good to me. I'll
> > > push it, barring any objections.
> >
> > This is capturing the eight records where the flag exists, so it looks
> > OK seen from here.
> >
> > As you said, there may be a point in reducing the output in the most
> > common case and not show the flag when !isCatalogRel, but I cannot get
> > excited about that either because that would require one to do more
> > cross-checks with the core code when looking at WAL dumps.
>
> Thank you for the comments. Agreed.
>
> I've just pushed, bf6260b39.
>

FYI, in the commitfest app, there seems to be two duplicated entries
for this item:

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/46/4694/
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/46/4695/

I've marked the latter one as committed, and will remove the former.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Add isCatalogRel in rmgrdesc
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum