Re: macaddr 64 bit (EUI-64) datatype support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Shay Rojansky
Subject Re: macaddr 64 bit (EUI-64) datatype support
Date
Msg-id CADT4RqBVGki0LCaW6C-015W3rMAa_UYV4HBevSVTs_oWPq3JfA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: macaddr 64 bit (EUI-64) datatype support  (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: macaddr 64 bit (EUI-64) datatype support
List pgsql-hackers
Yes. Before doing this change, it is better to confirm the approach and 
then do all the changes.

1. Does everyone agrees that renaming the existing datatype without
changing the OID?

As I said before, Npgsql for one loads data types by name, not by OID. So this would definitely cause breakage.

For users who actually need the new variable-length type, it seems perfectly reasonable to ask to switch to a new type - after all they're making a change in their system. It would really be preferable to leave the current type alone and create a new one.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(XLogCtl->Insert.exclusiveBackup)", File: "xlog.c", Line: 10200)
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL consistency check facility