Re: [HACKERS] varlena beyond 1GB and matrix - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kohei KaiGai
Subject Re: [HACKERS] varlena beyond 1GB and matrix
Date
Msg-id CADyhKSX1khGr4xsZZt1HQvmeTf3kuu1ysT3X0BEVuggAL9=V-w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] varlena beyond 1GB and matrix  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] varlena beyond 1GB and matrix
List pgsql-hackers
2016-12-23 8:23 GMT+09:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:
>>> Handling objects >1GB at all seems like the harder part of the
>>> problem.
>>>
>> I could get your point almost. Does the last line above mention about
>> amount of the data object >1GB? even if the "super-varlena" format
>> allows 64bit length?
>
> Sorry, I can't understand your question about what I wrote.
>
I thought you just pointed out it is always harder part to treat large
amount of data even if data format allows >1GB or more. Right?

-- 
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Potential data loss of 2PC files
Next
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] varlena beyond 1GB and matrix