Re: [pgadmin4][patch] Unit test fail on GreenPlum (#3190) - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

Hi

On Friday, March 9, 2018, Joao De Almeida Pereira <jdealmeidapereira@pivotal.io> wrote:

Hello Hackers,

Attached you can find the patch that skip some tests and correct issues on SQL that are failing when trying to connect to a GreenPlum database.

We did this by adding a attribute to to test_json called "db_type" that will carry the type of database we are running tests against.

Any reason we can't do that dynamically as we do with the EPAS-specific tests?

 

When we run tests against a GreenPlum instance the configuration would look like this:

{
  "name": "GreenPlum",
  "comment": "GreenPlum DB",
  "db_username": "gp",
  "host": "localhost",
  "db_password": "",
  "db_port": 5433,
  "maintenance_db": "postgres",
  "sslmode": "prefer",
  "tablespace_path": "",
  "enabled": true,
  "db_type": "gpdb"
}

Thanks

Joao

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company