On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 3:46 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks good.
>
> I have one minor comment:
>
> - * SUBREL_STATE_FINISHEDCOPY. The apply worker can also
> - * concurrently try to drop the origin and by this time
> - * the origin might be already removed. For these reasons,
> - * passing missing_ok = true.
> + * SUBREL_STATE_FINISHEDCOPY. So passing missing_ok = true.
>
> I think we should change "the apply worker" to "the tablesync worker"
> but should not remove this sentence. The fact that another process
> could concurrently try to drop the origin is still true.
>
> The rest looks good to me.
>
Updated as described.
regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia