Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alex Hunsaker
Subject Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators
Date
Msg-id CAFaPBrQxjrrkF7WGiiVHna__FuFAsQ=PA3xAkP5kEzh=1ZaPjw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators
List pgsql-hackers


On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
I wrote:

This thread seems to have died off without any clear resolution.  I'd
hoped somebody would try the patch on some nontrivial application to
see if it broke anything or caused any warnings, but it doesn't seem
like that is happening.


I tried it on a fairly typical web application. Around 5000 or so distinct statements according to pg_stat_statements. With operator_precedence_warning = on, no warnings yet.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: disallow operator "=>" and use it for named parameters
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators