On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Tom Lane <
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> This has been debated, and rejected, before.
>
I know this discussion...
> To mention just one problem, are we going to add nonstandard,
> non-backwards-compatible syntax to every single kind of CREATE to allow
> pg_dump to preserve the creation dates? Another interesting question is
> whether we should likewise track the last ALTER time, or perhaps whether
> a sufficiently major ALTER redefinition should update the creation time.
>
I agree with you because now we have Event Triggers...
> I'm inclined to think that anyone who really needs this should be
> pointed at event triggers. That feature (if it gets in) will allow
> people to track creation/DDL-change times with exactly the behavior
> they want.
>
Exactly, but Event Triggers [1] don't cover "CREATE DATABASE" statement, and for this reason I propose the patch to add a single column "datcreated" on shared catalog "pg_database".
