Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Date
Msg-id CAFjFpRf6ywGTCz6cy9aJe5vB=46vnc+ZHQ9qbn31Xve=MTwD_w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view


On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
On 2015-08-05 AM 06:11, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> On 2015-08-03 PM 09:24, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>>> For postgres_fdw it's a boolean server-level option 'twophase_compliant'
>>> (suggestions for name welcome).
>>>
>>
>> How about just 'twophase'?
>
> How about two_phase_commit?
>

Much cleaner, +1


I was more inclined to use an adjective, since it's a property of server, instead of a noun. But two_phase_commit looks fine as well, included in the patch attached.

Attached patch addresses all the concerns and suggestions from previous mails in this mail thread.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: max_connections and standby server
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.