Re: Windows CFBot is broken because ecpg dec_test.c error - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jelte Fennema-Nio
Subject Re: Windows CFBot is broken because ecpg dec_test.c error
Date
Msg-id CAGECzQRTo3xguwQyOAeLpYb22P9RjBwdFdEigO+oNjNhTj_zeg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Windows CFBot is broken because ecpg dec_test.c error  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 at 21:05, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
> For reference, you meant 53 right?

Yes, I meant 53

> If the
> CFBot always need one in "Future" state we should document that to make sure we
> don't miss that going forward (and perhaps automate it to make sure we dont
> make manual work for ourselves).

Afaict it doesn't need at least one in the "Future" state, instead it
needs one after the current[1] commitfest. I don't think it should
rely on that though. So I created an issue to fix that[2].

It does seem silly that we require people to manually create new
commitfests though, so I created an issue to track that[3]

[1]: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/current/
[2]: https://github.com/macdice/cfbot/issues/22
[3]: https://github.com/postgres/pgcommitfest/issues/25



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: problems with extensions compiling after upgrade to fc42 (and gcc15)
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimization for lower(), upper(), casefold() functions.