Re: Amazon High I/O instances - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Sébastien Lorion
Subject Re: Amazon High I/O instances
Date
Msg-id CAGa5y0M+t6neRtkygAf0mYFD_geShMRdN77uPxR2r8+VL=3QNQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Amazon High I/O instances  (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>)
Responses Re: Amazon High I/O instances
List pgsql-general
Ok, make sense .. I will update that as well and report back. Thank you for your advice.

Sébastien

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:04 PM, John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote:
On 09/12/12 4:49 PM, Sébastien Lorion wrote:
You set shared_buffers way below what is suggested in Greg Smith book (25% or more of RAM) .. what is the rationale behind that rule of thumb ? Other values are more or less what I set, though I could lower the effective_cache_size and vfs.zfs.arc_max and see how it goes.

I think those 25% rules were typically created when ram was no more than 4-8GB.

for our highly transactional workload, at least, too large of a shared_buffers seems to slow us down, perhaps due to higher overhead of managing that many 8k buffers.    I've heard other read-mostly workloads, such as data warehousing, can take advantage of larger buffer counts.




--
john r pierce                            N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca                         mid-left coast




--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Sébastien Lorion
Date:
Subject: Re: Amazon High I/O instances
Next
From: Sébastien Lorion
Date:
Subject: Re: Amazon High I/O instances