On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 11:49 PM Alvaro Herrera from 2ndQuadrant
<alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> > That means - after getting the live partitions from
> > prune_append_rel_partitions(), by the time the code tries to lock a
> > child, it's already dropped.
>
> Right.
>
> > However, similar check is not there in expand_partitioned_rtentry().
> > Introducing the same check will fix the issue. But, I don't know how
> > it affects the pruning part as this partition couldn't be pruned
> > earlier and that's why we're opening the child partition.
>
> Hmm, we could just remove the partition from the set of live partitions
> -- then it should behave the same as if the partition had been pruned.
> Something like the attached, perhaps.
>
Thanks for the patch. LGTM. I've verified that it's fixing the issue.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kuntal Ghosh