Re: wal_consistency_checking reports an inconsistency on master branch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: wal_consistency_checking reports an inconsistency on master branch
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wzm9fPb3v+Vx9mJ_t8d6OASUhQppMsq0J86d_FNrHhWJzQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to wal_consistency_checking reports an inconsistency on master branch  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: wal_consistency_checking reports an inconsistency on masterbranch
Re: wal_consistency_checking reports an inconsistency on masterbranch
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> In short, it looks like the tests added to update.sql by commit
> 2f178441 ("Allow UPDATE to move rows between partitions") lead to this
> failure, since I always hit a problem when update.sql is reached. I
> haven't gone to the trouble of digging any deeper than that just yet.

Without having looked at it in much detail, this seems rather more
likely to be the fault of 2f178441. That was recent enough that it's
easy to believe that I'd be the first to notice it, and actually has
on-disk changes, in the form of ItemPointerSetMovedPartitions().

-- 
Peter Geoghegan


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Instability in partition_prune test?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Instability in partition_prune test?