Re: analyze-in-stages post upgrade questions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: analyze-in-stages post upgrade questions
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwGhWjhKPZsorB6QG64dmaO0fVNERuWvfn98BYjVjT22EA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: analyze-in-stages post upgrade questions  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 3:14 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also am leaning towards treating this as v19 material.  It's a nontrivial
> behavior change, and this option is useful for major version upgrades,
> which is an area that we really don't want to surprise users too much.

+1

> Furthermore, auto-analyze doesn't process partitioned tables, either, so
> this introduces a bit of divergence.  (I'd love to see that project picked
> up again someday.  Perhaps I will take a gander...)

Sounds good!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Compilation issues for HASH_STATISTICS and HASH_DEBUG options
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: analyze-in-stages post upgrade questions