Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Smith
Subject Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Date
Msg-id CAHut+PsfWPkTcpZaMw_3cn2bPsfKRn_BwvMp=3pWkRO5Kd9TzQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Looking at the V29 style tablesync slot names now they appear like this:

WARNING:  could not drop tablesync replication slot
"pg_16397_sync_16389_6927117142022745645"
That is in the order subid +  relid + sysid

Now that I see it in a message it seems a bit strange with the sysid
just tacked onto the end like that.

I am wondering if reordering of parent to child might be more natural.
e.g sysid + subid + relid gives a more intuitive name IMO.

So in this example it would be "pg_sync_6927117142022745645_16397_16389"

Thoughts?

----
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith
Fujitsu Australia

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: [POC] Fast COPY FROM command for the table with foreign partitions
Next
From: "tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: libpq debug log