Re: [PATCH] Refactor bytea_sortsupport(), take two - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aleksander Alekseev
Subject Re: [PATCH] Refactor bytea_sortsupport(), take two
Date
Msg-id CAJ7c6TPyagp4p3781MqfDTDcsOSowwHR5RSpt-nrfF-jAMWmhA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Refactor bytea_sortsupport(), take two  (John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi John,

> How about this:
>
> "Short byteas will have terminating NUL bytes in the abbreviated
> datum. Abbreviated comparison need not  make a distinction between
> thse NUL bytes, and NUL bytes representing actual NULs in the
> authoritative representation." [...]
>
> After that, the rest seems to flow better at a quick glance.

Yes, it is much better now, thanks! Previously the comment was
reasoning about NUL bytes as if normally bytea can't have them which
IMO was confusing.


--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Álvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Import Statistics in postgres_fdw before resorting to sampling.