Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
Facebook
Downloads
Home
>
mailing lists
PG Sharding - Mailing list pgsql-general
From
Matej
Subject
PG Sharding
Date
January 29, 2018
17:34:18
Msg-id
CAJB+8maToQO3nnCgJ-giJ6Wsu+210O6rYEP-KWq0RLG_HZnfWQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
Raw
Responses
Re: PG Sharding
Re: PG Sharding
Re: PG Sharding
List
pgsql-general
Tree view
Hi Everyone.
We are looking at a rather large fin-tech installation. But as scalability requirements are high we look at sharding of-course.
I have looked at many sources for Postgresql sharding, but we are a little confused as to shared with schema or databases or both.
So far our understanding:
SCHEMA.
PROS:
- seems native to PG
- backup seems easier
- connection pooling seems easier, as you can use same connection between shard.
CONS:
- schema changes seems litlle more complicated
- heard of backup and maintenance problems
- also some caching problems.
DATABASE:
PROS:
-
schema changes litlle easier
- backup and administration seems more robust
CONS:
- heard of vacuum problems
- connection pooling is hard, as 100 shards would mean 100 pools
So what is actually the right approach? If anyone could
shed some light on my issue.
Thanks
pgsql-general
by date:
Previous
From:
Alban Hertroys
Date:
29 January 2018, 17:11:42
Subject:
Re: Information on savepoint requirement within transctions
Next
From:
Melvin Davidson
Date:
29 January 2018, 17:44:45
Subject:
Re: PG Sharding
Есть вопросы? Напишите нам!
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
I confirm that I have read and accepted PostgresPro’s
Privacy Policy
.
I agree to get Postgres Pro discount offers and other marketing communications.
✖
×
×
Everywhere
Documentation
Mailing list
List:
all lists
pgsql-general
pgsql-hackers
buildfarm-members
pgadmin-hackers
pgadmin-support
pgsql-admin
pgsql-advocacy
pgsql-announce
pgsql-benchmarks
pgsql-bugs
pgsql-chat
pgsql-cluster-hackers
pgsql-committers
pgsql-cygwin
pgsql-docs
pgsql-hackers-pitr
pgsql-hackers-win32
pgsql-interfaces
pgsql-jdbc
pgsql-jobs
pgsql-novice
pgsql-odbc
pgsql-patches
pgsql-performance
pgsql-php
pgsql-pkg-debian
pgsql-pkg-yum
pgsql-ports
pgsql-rrreviewers
pgsql-ru-general
pgsql-sql
pgsql-students
pgsql-testers
pgsql-translators
pgsql-www
psycopg
Period
anytime
within last day
within last week
within last month
within last 6 months
within last year
Sort by
date
reverse date
rank
Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
By continuing to browse this website, you agree to the use of cookies. Go to
Privacy Policy
.
I accept cookies