Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
Facebook
Downloads
Home
>
mailing lists
libpq: Request Pipelining/Batching status ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From
Matthieu Garrigues
Subject
libpq: Request Pipelining/Batching status ?
Date
July 10, 2020
15:08:20
Msg-id
CAJkzx4Tyfu+ObU5NRjM3w=+HvxzH24TeNbuHwYVNW20szC8kiQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
Raw
Responses
Re: libpq: Request Pipelining/Batching status ?
List
pgsql-hackers
Tree view
Hi all,
Do you know what is the status of Request Pipelining and/or Batching in libpq ?
I could see that I'm not the first one to think about it, I see an item in the todolist:
https://web.archive.org/web/20200125013930/https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo
And a thread here:
https://www.postgresql-archive.org/PATCH-Batch-pipelining-support-for-libpq-td5904551i80.html
And a patch here:
https://2ndquadrant.github.io/postgres/libpq-batch-mode.html
Seems like this boost performances a lot, drogon, a c++ framework outperform all
other web framework thanks to this fork:
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r19&hw=ph&test=update
https://github.com/TechEmpower/FrameworkBenchmarks/issues/5502
It would be nice to have it it the official libpq so we don't have to use an outdated fork
to have this feature.
Is anybody working on it ? is there lots of work to finalize this patch ?
Thanks in advance,
Matthieu
pgsql-hackers
by date:
Previous
From:
Peter Eisentraut
Date:
10 July 2020, 15:05:04
Subject:
Re:
vs
formatting in the docs
Next
From:
Julien Rouhaud
Date:
10 July 2020, 15:13:26
Subject:
Re: expose parallel leader in CSV and log_line_prefix
Есть вопросы? Напишите нам!
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
I confirm that I have read and accepted PostgresPro’s
Privacy Policy
.
I agree to get Postgres Pro discount offers and other marketing communications.
✖
×
×
Everywhere
Documentation
Mailing list
List:
all lists
pgsql-general
pgsql-hackers
buildfarm-members
pgadmin-hackers
pgadmin-support
pgsql-admin
pgsql-advocacy
pgsql-announce
pgsql-benchmarks
pgsql-bugs
pgsql-chat
pgsql-cluster-hackers
pgsql-committers
pgsql-cygwin
pgsql-docs
pgsql-hackers-pitr
pgsql-hackers-win32
pgsql-interfaces
pgsql-jdbc
pgsql-jobs
pgsql-novice
pgsql-odbc
pgsql-patches
pgsql-performance
pgsql-php
pgsql-pkg-debian
pgsql-pkg-yum
pgsql-ports
pgsql-rrreviewers
pgsql-ru-general
pgsql-sql
pgsql-students
pgsql-testers
pgsql-translators
pgsql-www
psycopg
Period
anytime
within last day
within last week
within last month
within last 6 months
within last year
Sort by
date
reverse date
rank
Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
By continuing to browse this website, you agree to the use of cookies. Go to
Privacy Policy
.
I accept cookies