Re: commitfest 2016-11 status summary - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Haribabu Kommi
Subject Re: commitfest 2016-11 status summary
Date
Msg-id CAJrrPGfH5d4XcX4iNgAtTwNHn_5mGvEo-FiXQ5ca-7+HT7mmLQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: commitfest 2016-11 status summary  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

Hi All,


The commitfest status summary after one week of progress:

Needs review: 78
Waiting on author: 16
Ready for Commiter: 19
Commited: 28
Moved to next CF: 0
Rejected: 3
Returned with feedback: 3
TOTAL: 147


Overall progress of completion - 23%.
week-1 progress of completion - 9%.


There are many patches that are in "ready for committer" state, committers
are working hard to move the patches, but there are many patches that are
getting added into "ready for committer" state. 

There are some patches on "waiting on author" with no updates from author
for a long time, please take some action within 1-3 days, otherwise the patch
status can be marked as "returned with feedback" for the smoother operation
of the commitfest.

There are patches with the reviewer assigned, but no review is shared yet.
Please try to share your review related to the patch in 1-3 days. In case if the
reviewer is busy with some other work, you can remove yourself as a  reviewer,
so that at least someone can review that patch. I will try to ask the reviewer
in the corresponding thread if the patch didn't receive any review after 3 days.
This is not to blame some one, just to ensure the smooth progress of commitfest.

There are still some patches with no reviewer assigned. Please consider
reviewing some patches. The review can be a code, test and etc, whichever is
comfortable to you. We need your help.

There are some authors who submitted patches to the commitfest but not reviewing
any patch as a reviewer. Please try to review a patch that is suitable to you. We need
your help.

Thanks everyone for smoother operation of commitfest.

Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability
Next
From: Andreas Karlsson
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_sequence catalog