Re: inefficient/wrong plan cache mode selection for queries with partitioned tables (postgresql 17) - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Maxim Boguk
Subject Re: inefficient/wrong plan cache mode selection for queries with partitioned tables (postgresql 17)
Date
Msg-id CAK-MWwQWMK=d_Uzt63hstuYArAuB6Grv9sjYHMah1JXhgkxG3A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: inefficient/wrong plan cache mode selection for queries with partitioned tables (postgresql 17)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: inefficient/wrong plan cache mode selection for queries with partitioned tables (postgresql 17)
List pgsql-performance


On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 6:33 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Maxim Boguk <maxim.boguk@gmail.com> writes:
> And the problem is that the cost of a custom plan ignores the cost of
> planning itself (which is like 2x orders of magnitude worse than the cost
> of real time partition pruning of a generic plan).

False.  The estimate is evidently pretty wrong, but it's not that
there is no consideration at all.  See around line 1370 in
src/backend/utils/cache/plancache.c.

                        regards, tom lane

Thank you.
Reading the code - probably the lowest hanging fruit is to make
'The current multiplier of 1000 * cpu_operator_cost' configurable in the future versions.

PS: it's always nice to see when my ad-hoc idea (about N*nrelations as cost planner estimate) is already implemented.


--
Maxim Boguk
Senior Postgresql DBA

Phone UA: +380 99 143 0000
Phone AU: +61  45 218 5678

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Andrei Lepikhov
Date:
Subject: Re: inefficient/wrong plan cache mode selection for queries with partitioned tables (postgresql 17)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: inefficient/wrong plan cache mode selection for queries with partitioned tables (postgresql 17)