On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Do we have consensus on doing this? Should we have the warning on > by default, or off?
I vote for defaulting the warning to off. If that proves to be too problematic, I'd take that as a sign that this whole change is not as low-impact as we're hoping, and maybe consider a rethink.
Do we want to have three states? On, Off, and Auto? We can then change what Auto means in a point-release while letting people who have chosen On or Off have their wish.
Auto could also consider some other data - like how long ago the database was initialized...
I would vote for Auto meaning On in the .0 release.
