On Monday, April 22, 2024, Michael Paquier <
michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:36:20PM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> There is little upside to preventing the existence of an unlogged
> partitioned table at this point. I have just submitted a doc patch to deal
> with that side of the equation.
I would not object to that. However, now that we're five years into
this problem, I'd rather treat that as a new entire feature than
change the existing behavior in the back branches.
Not changing unlogged property of a partitioned table on ALTER TABLE
is of course no good.
Correct, it is an outright bug that I see no reason not to just fix and back-patch. The new feature needs its own thread so as not to have this one see the same fate it had 5 years ago.
David J.
