Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f-wRKSYsefyqXUSEeMhGEu9JYHuEAk8Xtoe=u_d_zp5+g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Runtime Partition Pruning  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 5 April 2018 at 14:01, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I've attached an updated patchset against Amit's v49 faster partition
> pruning patch.

Well, v19 was short lived. 0005 conflicted with some recent changes to MERGE.

The attached v20 patch set is now based on Amit's runtime partition
prune v50 [1].

There are a few changes since v19:

1. I've run pgindent on the entire patchset.
2. Made a pass over the comments and fixed a few things that were not
quite right. Also improved some wording.
3. Fixed a small error in make_partition_pruneinfo where I had
accidentally used the 'i' variable for two purposes at once. There was
no live bug there, but I've now changed things around as what was
there was wrong regardless of if it was causing issues or not.
4. updated typedefs.list with new typedefs added in the patchset.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/77a518ac-e4a0-4cd1-9988-e5d754a6501f%40lab.ntt.co.jp

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Validate page level checksums in base backups
Next
From: Matheus de Oliveira
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btree_gin, add support for uuid, bool, name, bpchar andanyrange types