Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Rowley
Subject Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Date
Msg-id CAKJS1f_EZ3jHUDH1zxdauaq_2BGPjpzxJ-noMGfFuz3EehaC3g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
List pgsql-hackers
While looking at the docs in [1], I saw that we still mention:

4. Ensure that the constraint_exclusion configuration parameter is not
disabled in postgresql.conf. If it is, queries will not be optimized
as desired.

This is no longer true. The attached patch removed it.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/ddl-partitioning.html

-- 
 David Rowley                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Next
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in Physical Replication Slots (at least9.5)?