Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
Facebook
Downloads
Home
>
mailing lists
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14746: sub query's plan not right? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs
From
Feike Steenbergen
Subject
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14746: sub query's plan not right?
Date
July 26, 2017
11:58:59
Msg-id
CAK_s-G1uKcq84DHKPJ11+N3xfVX9qS9=4McF8UtM+Ox0rF9qVg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
Raw
In response to
[BUGS] BUG #14746: sub query's plan not right?
(digoal@126.com)
List
pgsql-bugs
Tree view
> is this a bug ? or it can be improved?
Perhaps, for me it rings a bell of using OFFSET 0 as a hack, that at least has
the property of not changing the logic of your query:
select (t.b).aid,(t.b).val,(t.b).crt_time
from
(
select
(
select b from b
where b.aid=
a.id
order by crt_time desc limit 1
)
from a offset 0
) t
where (t.b).aid is not null;
Previous similar discussion:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E1RfAwz-0006Us-7B%40wrigleys.postgresql.org
Some other pointers:
https://blog.2ndquadrant.com/postgresql-ctes-are-optimization-fences/
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14897816/how-can-i-prevent-postgres-from-inlining-a-subquery
pgsql-bugs
by date:
Previous
From:
Amit Langote
Date:
26 July 2017, 09:29:41
Subject:
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14759: insert into foreign data partitions fail
Next
From:
Rick Otten
Date:
26 July 2017, 17:47:26
Subject:
[BUGS] signal 11 segfaults with parallel workers
Есть вопросы? Напишите нам!
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
I confirm that I have read and accepted PostgresPro’s
Privacy Policy
.
I agree to get Postgres Pro discount offers and other marketing communications.
✖
×
×
Everywhere
Documentation
Mailing list
List:
all lists
pgsql-general
pgsql-hackers
buildfarm-members
pgadmin-hackers
pgadmin-support
pgsql-admin
pgsql-advocacy
pgsql-announce
pgsql-benchmarks
pgsql-bugs
pgsql-chat
pgsql-cluster-hackers
pgsql-committers
pgsql-cygwin
pgsql-docs
pgsql-hackers-pitr
pgsql-hackers-win32
pgsql-interfaces
pgsql-jdbc
pgsql-jobs
pgsql-novice
pgsql-odbc
pgsql-patches
pgsql-performance
pgsql-php
pgsql-pkg-debian
pgsql-pkg-yum
pgsql-ports
pgsql-rrreviewers
pgsql-ru-general
pgsql-sql
pgsql-students
pgsql-testers
pgsql-translators
pgsql-www
psycopg
Period
anytime
within last day
within last week
within last month
within last 6 months
within last year
Sort by
date
reverse date
rank
Services
24×7×365 Technical Support
Migration to PostgreSQL
High Availability Deployment
Database Audit
Remote DBA for PostgreSQL
Products
Postgres Pro Enterprise
Postgres Pro Standard
Cloud Solutions
Postgres Extensions
Resources
Blog
Documentation
Webinars
Videos
Presentations
Community
Events
Training Courses
Books
Demo Database
Mailing List Archives
About
Leadership team
Partners
Customers
In the News
Press Releases
Press Info
By continuing to browse this website, you agree to the use of cookies. Go to
Privacy Policy
.
I accept cookies