On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wonder whether the most effective use of time at this point
> wouldn't be to fix jsonb_ops to do that, rather than arguing about
> what to rename it to. If it didn't have the failure-for-long-strings
> problem I doubt anybody would be unhappy about making it the default.
I would expect the selectivity of keys on their own to be very low
with idiomatic usage of jsonb. Typically, every row in a table will
have almost the same keys. The current default opclass makes more
sense for when that isn't the case.
--
Peter Geoghegan
