On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 11:33 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> writes: > It looks like reindexdb has the same issue. It would be good to > update reindexdb to skip temp tables as well to fix this.
Agreed.
> For the proposed patch, it seems better to use CppAsString2(RELPERSISTENCE_TEMP) > instead of 't'.
+1, if we can easily avoid hard-coding that value we should do so. It's not that we're going to change the value; it's that it makes it way easier to grep the source tree for relevant code.
