Re: Reduce "Var IS [NOT] NULL" quals during constant folding - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Richard Guo
Subject Re: Reduce "Var IS [NOT] NULL" quals during constant folding
Date
Msg-id CAMbWs4-R5PWEJ7Ze_ZL30c7cA+87FeDK4YAmC7Zv1tsao2ObpQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reduce "Var IS [NOT] NULL" quals during constant folding  (Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Reduce "Var IS [NOT] NULL" quals during constant folding
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 4:32 PM Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> wrote:
> I must say that I appreciate Tom's idea and see significant benefits in
> making the parse tree a read-only structure. In complex queries, it can
> be frustrating to make copies of the parse tree, leading to complaints
> from users about insufficient memory allocation. This is why, in our
> enterprise fork, we support a specific option to avoid copying the parse
> tree multiple times.

I don't see how the changes in this patchset violate Tom's proposal
regarding keeping the parse tree read-only.  The only potential issue
I can see is that we may clear the rte->inh flag in some cases -- but
that behavior has existed for a long time, not starting from this
patchset.

> Therefore, it would be better to find a way to refactor the
> `preprocess_relation_rtes` function to gather table statistics lazily
> into the hash table when they are needed. For example, we could do this
> at the moment of creating the `RelOptInfo` or before a subquery pull-up,
> without modifying the RTE at all.

All the catalog information collected in preprocess_relation_rtes() is
needed very early in the planner.  I don't see how we could move that
logic to a later stage, such as at the moment of creating RelOptInfos
as you mentioned.

Thanks
Richard



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: A assert failure when initdb with track_commit_timestamp=on
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore --no-policies should not restore policies' comment