Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1w17GKXFHgt8mUrfcP80Otbd9ye8uTufX-z_JFMD0nexQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2
List pgsql-bugs
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> writes:
>> On 28.11.2012 06:27, Noah Misch wrote:
>>> I observed a similar problem with 9.2.  Despite a restore_command that failed
>>> every time, startup from a hot backup completed.  At the time, I suspected a
>>> mistake on my part.
>
>> I believe this was caused by this little typo/thinko:
>
> Is this related at all to the problem discussed over at
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2012-11/msg00709.php
> ?  The conclusion-so-far in that thread seems to be that an error
> ought to be thrown for recovery_target_time earlier than the
> backup stop time, but one is not getting thrown.

It is not directly related.  That thread was about 9.1.6.

In the newly fixed 9_2_STABLE, that problem still shows up the same as
it does in 9.1.6.

(In 9.2.1, recovery sometimes blows up before that particular problem
could be detected, which is what lead me here in the first place--that
is the extent of the relationship AFAIK)

To see this one, follow the instructions in my previous email, but set
recovery_target_time to a time just after the end of the
pg_start_backup checkpoint, rather than just before it, and turn on
hot_standby

Cheers,

Jeff

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: PITR potentially broken in 9.2
Next
From: mkolomeitsev@gmail.com
Date:
Subject: BUG #7711: Accessing nested composite types in PL/PgSQL doesn't work