Re: [HACKERS] GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Jeff Janes
Subject Re: [HACKERS] GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes
Date
Msg-id CAMkU=1wpCy2ow4VXQ3f_q5eUaNzXWj2E5O2O-hh-EVfZgdD2wg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes  (Tan Tran <tankimtran@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

Unfortunately, I don't believe that it's possible to do this easily
today because of the way bucket splits are handled.  I wrote about
this previously here, with an idea for solving the problem:

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoZyMoJSrFxHXQ06G8jhjXQcsKvDiHB_8z_7nc7hj7iHYQ@mail.gmail.com

Sadly, no one responded.  :-(

On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Tan Tran <tankimtran@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for alerting me to your previous idea. While I don't know enough about Postgresql internals to judge its merits yet, I'll write some pseudocode based on it in my proposal; and I'll relegate it to a "reach" proposal alongside a more straightforward one.

Tan


Hi Tan,

I'm not familiar with the inner workings of the GSoC, but I don't know if this can be relegated to a "stretch" goal.  WAL logging is an all or nothing thing.  I think that, to be applied to the codebase (which I assume is the goal of GSoC), all actions need to be implemented.  That is probably why this has remained open so long: there is no incremental way to get the code written.  (But I would like to see it get done, I don't want to discourage that.)

Cheers,

Jeff

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL User Group in Singapore
Next
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL User Group in Singapore