On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 12:17 PM Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote: > Unrelated to this problem, but I wondered why autoprewarm doesn''t > launch background workers for each database simultaneously instead of > waiting for each one to finish a db before moving onto the next one. > Is it simply to limit the number of bgworkers taking up resources?
That's probably part of it, but also (1) a system that allowed for multiple workers would be somewhat more complex to implement and (2) I'm not sure how beneficial it would be. We go to some trouble to make the I/O as sequential as possible, and this would detract from that. I also don't know how long prewarming normally takes -- if it's fast enough already, then maybe this doesn't matter. But if somebody is having a problem with autoprewarm being slow and wants to implement a multi-worker system to make it faster, cool.
