Re: [pgadmin][patch] [GreenPlum] When user press Explain Plan andExplain analyze plan an error is displayed - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers
From | Akshay Joshi |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [pgadmin][patch] [GreenPlum] When user press Explain Plan andExplain analyze plan an error is displayed |
Date | |
Msg-id | CANxoLDeQZt-QxFkm3DO=9KaArySnfpysF8cZpojyWVd7ntTaxA@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: [pgadmin][patch] [GreenPlum] When user press Explain Plan andExplain analyze plan an error is displayed (Dave Page <dave.page@enterprisedb.com>) |
Responses |
Re: [pgadmin][patch] [GreenPlum] When user press Explain Plan andExplain analyze plan an error is displayed
Re: [pgadmin][patch] [GreenPlum] When user press Explain Plan andExplain analyze plan an error is displayed |
List | pgadmin-hackers |
Hi Hackers
Attached is the patch file to fix the RM #2815.
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Dave Page <dave.page@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote: On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 3:06 PM, Dave Page <dave.page@enterprisedb.com> wrote:I'm a little concerned that noone mentioned this earlier; I'm supposed to be building the release this afternoon, and I expect this change to at the very least be complex to fully test and verify. What's the ETA on the patch? What steps are being taken to ensure it's correct and doesn't cause regressions?Harshal has already mentioned in the RM. Currently I am changing the logic, but it may take time to complete, fully test and verify. I'll try my best to do it asap.Sure, but how many of us are watching every comment on every RM? I know I'm not (I currently average ~400 emails/day).--On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 7:51 AM, Akshay Joshi <akshay.joshi@enterprisedb.com> wrote: Hi JoaoIt seems that this fix broke the functionality of RM #2815. It is mentioned in the RM what needs to be fixed now and I am currently working on it.While fixing the issue following problem that I foundFrom the above list, some of the function calls are generic where they need "responseJSON" and "responseJSON.info", so we can't change that. Possible solution could be pass one extra flag as parameter to identify the object is a axios response or javascript response to above functions and change the logic accordingly.
- In "start_running_query.py" file, we need to remove check "if conn.connected()" from "__execute_query" function as we required exception to be thrown while executing the query to identify the ConnectionLost.
- In "execute_query.js" we have used axios to execute the query and in case of exception, object is different then normal javascript response object.
- We call following functions when exception or error comes and send the "<object>.response.data" as parameter
- wasConnectionLostToServer(): Check for the readyState parameter, which is not the part of "<object>.response.data".
- extractErrorMessage(): Check for the "responseJSON" and "responseJSON.info", which is not the part of "<object>.response.data".
- is_pga_login_required(): Check for the "responseJSON" and "responseJSON.info", which is not the part of "<object>.response.data".
- is_new_transaction_required():
Check for the "responseJSON" and "responseJSON.info", which is not the part of "<object>.response.data". Please let me know your thoughts or any other suggestion.--On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 8:17 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:Thanks, applied.On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 2:35 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <jdealmeidapereira@pivotal.io> wrote:Hello,Attached you can find the fix for the current pronlemOn Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 7:29 AM Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:Hi Joao,It looks like Jenkins has taken umbrage to this change, at least with Python 3.x. Can you take a look please?Thanks.On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:Thanks, patches applied.--On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 10:50 PM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <jdealmeidapereira@pivotal.io> wrote:Hi Hackers,This is quite a big patch in order to solve the problem with the Explain Plan.We sent 2 patches that have the following:- update-javascript-packages.diff Add package:is-docker to select a specific setting when running the Chrome tests inDockerUpgrade the version of:- babel-loader- extract-text-webpack-plugin- jasmine-core- jasmine-enzyme- moment- explain-plan-greenplum.diffExtract SQLEditor.execute and SQLEditor._poll into their own files and add test around themExtract SQLEditor backend functions that start executing query to their own files and add tests around itMove the Explain SQL from the front-end and now pass the Explain plan parameters as a JSON object in the start query call.Extract the compile_template_name into a function that can be used by the different places that try to select the version of the template and the server typeThanksJoaoDave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company--Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company--Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL CompanyDave Page
VP, Chief Architect, Tools & Installers
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake--Dave Page
VP, Chief Architect, Tools & Installers
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
Akshay Joshi
Sr. Software Architect

Phone: +91 20-3058-9517
Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
Mobile: +91 976-788-8246
Attachment
pgadmin-hackers by date: