On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 12:04 PM Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com> wrote:
> Patch attached
+/* Replication Protocol sent by the primary */
+
+#define PqMsg_XlogData 'w'
+#define PqMsg_PrimaryKeepAlive 'k'
+#define PqMsg_PrimaryStatusUpdate 's'
+
+
+/* Replication Protocol sent by the standby */
+
+#define PqMsg_StandbyStatus 'r'
+#define PqMsg_HotStandbyFeedback 'h'
+#define PqMsg_RequestPrimaryStatus 'p'
Since these are part of the replication subprotocol (i.e. tunneled,
via CopyData) rather than the top-level wire protocol, do they deserve
their own prefix? PqReplMsg_* maybe?
+/* These are the codes sent by the frontend and backend. */
+
+#define PqMsg_PasswordMessage 'p'
+
+/* These are the codes sent by the frontend and backend. */
Is this change intended?
--Jacob