Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Shinya Kato
Subject Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
Date
Msg-id CAOzEurQZ1a+6d1K8b=+Ww1NFQVwAt9KSCQsBWXYBaPnYCenK3g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 6:42 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 01:08:33PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > I have applied 0001 for now to add ATT_PARTITIONED_TABLE.  Attached is
> > the remaining piece.
>
> And the second piece is now applied as of e2bab2d79204.
> --
> Michael

Hi,

Should we consider preventing tab completion for PARTITION BY
immediately after CREATE TABLE name (...)? Or is it fine to leave it
as is, given that it's syntactically correct?

--
Best regards,
Shinya Kato
NTT OSS Center

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Custom Glibc collation version strings under LOCPATH
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Enhance pg_createsubscriber to create required standby.