On Fri, Jul 4, 2025 at 2:41 PM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 8:33 PM Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Em qua., 18 de jun. de 2025 às 07:29, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >> Considering fpextra cannot be NULL, I think the proposed change is
> >> something more than necessary. IMO I think it is more appropriate to
> >> just add an assertion and a comment for that like the attached, to
> >> avoid this kind of confusion. I think I should have done so when
> >> committing this.
> >
> > I disapprove of this change, for me it worsens readability.
> > It is better to continue without any changes, then.
> > But if there is consensus, go ahead.
>
> I'm not sure this worsens readability, but I still think it would be
> useful to avoid the same confusion in the future, so barring
> objections, I will push the patch as a master-only improvement.
Pushed after modifying the comment a little bit and fixing indentation.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita