Re: 7.2 stuff - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Christopher Kings-Lynne |
---|---|
Subject | Re: 7.2 stuff |
Date | |
Msg-id | GNELIHDDFBOCMGBFGEFOOEIJCBAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: 7.2 stuff (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Responses |
Re: 7.2 stuff
Re: 7.2 stuff |
List | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, Tom - there's a comment for you further down... > > This problem is also what's stopped me submitting the ALTER TABLE / ADD > > PRIMARY stuff. Once the ADD UNIQUE bit is correct, ADD PRIMARY > is trivial. > > > > (See: http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=1035632) I suggest > > reading the complete thread. I have fixed some of the problems in my > > private cvs, but no patch has been sent in... > > > > Some of the issues perhaps I should send in a patch for ASAP?? All of the above is a non-issue - it was implemented by tom in the parser, and my code was removed. Howver, add primary key needs a regression test. > > > key already exists > > > > over the specified fields > > > > * PSQL - SHOW FOREIGN KEYS > > > > - Still working on a query. If I come up with a good one - > > > would a catalog > > > > view of them be useful? > > > > Is there a pg_get_* function for getting foreign key definitions yet? I still want to do the above - however Stephen Sazbo has ideas about changing all the fk stuff... > > > > * -ALTER TABLE DROP CHECK > > > > - Already committed > > > > Yeah, committed. Committed - it needs a regression test tho. > > > > * ALTER TABLE DROP PRIMARY KEY > > > > - Done, will need review > > > > * ALTER TABLE DROP UNIQUE > > > > - Done, will need review > > > > Wrote them, but they're uncommitted. Don't worry about them until 7.3. I'll dredge this up again if I can. All it does is add a standards compliant alternative syntax for dropping those constraints. Tom - can you just do this in the parser, like you did it for the ADD constraints??? > > > > * ALTER TABLE DROP FOREIGN KEY > > > > - Harder than I thought :) Working on it. > > > > This is a toughie this one! And also depends on future fk changes. > > > > * Check that pgclass.relfkeys is being set correctly. > > > > - Is pgclass.relfkeys being used at the moment? > > > > It looked to me that pgclass.relfkeys wasn't ever being set or > updated. Is > > this true/correct? Correct. > > > > * WILDCARDS IN PG_DUMP > > > > - It would be nice to be able to dump tables via wildcards, > > > or once schemas > > > > exist to dump an entire schema I guess. > > > > That was just one of my little wish lists. I have a database > with about a > > hundred tables in it and related sets of tables all share the > same prefix. > > For instance, I would like to be able to pg_dump all the diary > tables in one > > go. > > > > ie. pg_dump -t diary_\* audb > dump.sql > > > > Don't know if there would be widespread enough demand for this feature > > tho... The above would be a nice feature... > > > > * CHECK CREATING DUPLICATE NAMED FOREIGN KEYS > > > > - I seem to be able to create duplicate named fk's, > plus I think the > > > > '<unnamed>' ones should be given auto name to make dropping > constraint > > > > easier... > > Pretty clear. Chris
pgsql-hackers by date: