Re: pg_class (system) table increasing size. - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | dhaval jaiswal |
---|---|
Subject | Re: pg_class (system) table increasing size. |
Date | |
Msg-id | MA1PR01MB00390F2F3D0A5473A7049AC0DFB50@MA1PR01MB0039.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: pg_class (system) table increasing size. (dhaval jaiswal <dhavallj@hotmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: pg_class (system) table increasing size.
|
List | pgsql-general |
Adding to above. Below are the outputs.
select count(*) from pg_stat_sys_tables where n_tup_ins =0 ;
count
-------
326
(1 row)
select count(*) from pg_stat_sys_tables where n_tup_upd =0 ;
count
-------
358
(1 row)
select count(*) from pg_stat_sys_tables where n_tup_del =0 ;
count
-------
344
(1 row)
select count(*) from pg_stat_sys_tables where n_tup_hot_upd =0 ;
count
-------
358
(1 row)
select count(*) from pg_stat_sys_tables where n_live_tup =0 ;
count
-------
326
(1 row)
select count(*) from pg_stat_sys_tables where n_dead_tup =0 ;
count
-------
346
(1 row)
Sent from Outlook
From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org <pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org> on behalf of dhaval jaiswal <dhavallj@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 11:04 PM
To: Kevin Grittner; Alvaro Herrera
Cc: Adrian Klaver; David G. Johnston; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_class (system) table increasing size.
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 11:04 PM
To: Kevin Grittner; Alvaro Herrera
Cc: Adrian Klaver; David G. Johnston; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_class (system) table increasing size.
I did check and found it was the bloated size of pg_class which was slowing down the performance.
It got fixed by adding in routine maintenance task. Things are fine now.
However, I want to know how come pg_class (system table) get bloated/affected.
What could be the possible ways, where i can look into.
Due to business impact auto vacuum is off.
Sent from Outlook
From: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 3:49 AM
To: Alvaro Herrera
Cc: dhaval jaiswal; Adrian Klaver; David G. Johnston; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_class (system) table increasing size.
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 3:49 AM
To: Alvaro Herrera
Cc: dhaval jaiswal; Adrian Klaver; David G. Johnston; pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pg_class (system) table increasing size.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Looks like you lost the stat data awhile ago (probably due to a server
> crash, or pg_stats_reset()) and it never got updated. I suggest doing
> "ANALZYE pg_class" to create initial stats; that might prompt autovacuum
> to vacuum the table. If the bloat is excessive, vacuuming might take a
> very long time, in which case perhaps consider VACUUM FULL (but be very
> aware of its consequences first).
>
> I think it's likely that this has happened to other catalogs as well, so
> check the pg_stat_sys_tables view for other entries with all zeroes in
> the n_tup_* columns.
+1
Also, you may want to review your autovacuum settings to make sure
they are aggressive enough. You didn't describe you machine, your
workload, or your vacuum regimen, but if it's a large machine you
would probably need to raise autovacuum_vacuum_cost limit. And if
autovacuum somehow got turned *off* you are likely to have all
kinds of problems with bloat, and may need to schedule some down
time to get it cleaned up.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Looks like you lost the stat data awhile ago (probably due to a server
> crash, or pg_stats_reset()) and it never got updated. I suggest doing
> "ANALZYE pg_class" to create initial stats; that might prompt autovacuum
> to vacuum the table. If the bloat is excessive, vacuuming might take a
> very long time, in which case perhaps consider VACUUM FULL (but be very
> aware of its consequences first).
>
> I think it's likely that this has happened to other catalogs as well, so
> check the pg_stat_sys_tables view for other entries with all zeroes in
> the n_tup_* columns.
+1
Also, you may want to review your autovacuum settings to make sure
they are aggressive enough. You didn't describe you machine, your
workload, or your vacuum regimen, but if it's a large machine you
would probably need to raise autovacuum_vacuum_cost limit. And if
autovacuum somehow got turned *off* you are likely to have all
kinds of problems with bloat, and may need to schedule some down
time to get it cleaned up.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
pgsql-general by date: