Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres -- - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --
Date
Msg-id NOEFLCFHBPDAFHEIPGBOEEHKCEAA.simon@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-performance
> Stephen Frost
> * Markus Schaber (schabios@logi-track.com) wrote:
> > Generally, what is the fastest way for doing bulk processing of
> > update-if-primary-key-matches-and-insert-otherwise operations?
>
> This is a very good question, and I havn't seen much of an answer to it
> yet.  I'm curious about the answer myself, actually.  In the more recent
> SQL specs, from what I understand, this is essentially what the 'MERGE'
> command is for.  This was recently added and unfortunately is not yet
> supported in Postgres.  Hopefully it will be added soon.
>

Yes, I think it is an important feature for both Data Warehousing (used in
set-operation mode for bulk processing) and OLTP (saves a round-trip to the
database, so faster on single rows also). It's in my top 10 for 2005.

Best Regards, Simon Riggs



pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "aaron werman"
Date:
Subject: Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres -- merge tables
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres -- merge tables