RE: Missing program_XXX calling in pgbench tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
Subject RE: Missing program_XXX calling in pgbench tests
Date
Msg-id OSCPR01MB1496610451F5896375B2562E6F56BA@OSCPR01MB14966.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Missing program_XXX calling in pgbench tests  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses Re: Missing program_XXX calling in pgbench tests
List pgsql-hackers
Dear Fujii-san,

> I agree with Peter. I don't think patches 0002 and 0003 are necessary.
> 
> As for 0004, it adds tests for the short options -? and -V, which
> duplicate the existing tests for the long options --help and --version.
> I'm not sure it's worth adding tests just to confirm that the short
> and long options behave the same.

Only adding 0004 is not allowed because it can fail due to other commands.
So let's drop them.

I verified 0001 can be applied cleanly for all supported branches. To clarify,
let me attach the 0001 patch again. Please focus on it...

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore - cannot to restore blobs in dictionary format from older pg dumps
Next
From: Xuneng Zhou
Date:
Subject: Re: Add new wait event to XactLockTableWait