On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I think it would be a bad idea to go around and yank out NOT_USED code
> > wholesale --- this should be looked at on a case-by-case basis, with
> > consideration of whether the code might be useful again in future.
> >
> > But I think I might vote for pruning the _deadcode directories
> > wholesale. I suspect the files in them are suffering from
> > irrecoverable bit rot.
>
> I disagree on _deadcode. While the code is rotted, it does implement
> some full functions that have no other history, like verion.c for
> versioning and xfunc for expensive functions. Yanking them means we can
> never know what they did.
even 'yanked' code is still in the cvs repository ... is it something that
ppl actually refer to, or are just afraid of possibly needing/wanting to
go back and look at it? maybe just add a '.readme' file to a subdirectory
to note files that were removed or something like that?
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
