Re: Removing our datasource/pooling implementation. - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Kris Jurka
Subject Re: Removing our datasource/pooling implementation.
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSO.4.56.0501102231430.25062@leary.csoft.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Removing our datasource/pooling implementation.  (Oliver Jowett <oliver@opencloud.com>)
Responses Re: Removing our datasource/pooling implementation.
List pgsql-jdbc

On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Oliver Jowett wrote:

> I use our plain DataSource and ConnectionPoolDataSource implementations.
> Please keep them; the CPDS, especially, has scope to do driver-specific
> work (consider RESET CONNECTION on proxy connection close()) that can't
> be done at a higher level easily.
>

The real problems seem to be in our PooledConnection implemention which is
what I really wanted to get rid of.  Since that's needed for CPDS I've
kept the pooling datasource implementation, but updated the documentation
to more strongly recommend against using it.

Kris Jurka


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Kevin Schmidt
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Help with this exception...
Next
From: Venkatesh Babu
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Help with this exception...