Re: src/tools/msvc usage instructions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Jeremy Drake |
---|---|
Subject | Re: src/tools/msvc usage instructions |
Date | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSO.4.64.0610012310350.7684@resin.csoft.net Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: src/tools/msvc usage instructions ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>) |
Responses |
Re: src/tools/msvc usage instructions
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > This appears to not work out well. If I copy the generated > > files from bison from a linux box, then they are ok, but if I > > try to use ones generated using that version of bison, it > > does not compile. I'll look around for a different one. > > That's the onw I'm using. However, be sure to get version 1.875-4, and > *not* version 2.1. Oops, that was it. > If you do "build solution" it should build all project sin the correct > order - there are dependency references set between them that should > take care of this automatically. If I do build solution it tells me "Project not selected to build for this solution configuration" for all projects, then 55 skipped at the end. > > Do you have any idea how to get the environment to know where > > windows.h is? I even explicitly added the directory to the INCLUDE > > environment variable, but it did not work. I will try switching to > > short paths in there in case it is an issue of paths with spaces. > > In my environment, that gets set when I start the Visual Studio command > prompt - that's the whole point abou tusing the VS commandprompt and not > a normal one. I think you get a question about integrating the Platform > SDK with Visual studio when you install it - any chance you missed that > one? Well, it works in the gui, so I thought I got that integrated correctly. One of the deals with the visual c express thing is that it does not come with the headers and libraries and that you have to use the platform sdk instead. > > > > > I already have ActivePerl and ActivePython installed, so > > those should > > > work out. I am not really concerned about krb5 and ldap, > > so as long > > > as commenting them out will disable them, that is good. > > You can safely leave LDAP in, because it uses only the builtin > functionality in the OS and no external dependencies. > > //Magnus > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq > > -- "I don't know what you mean by `glory,'" Alice saidHumpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. "Of course you don't -- till I tell you. I meant `there's a nice knock-down argument for you!'""But glory doesn't mean `a nice knock-down argument,'" Alice objected."When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean -- neither more nor less.""The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things.""The question is," said Humpty Dumpty, "which is to be master-- that's all." -- Lewis Carroll, "Through the Looking Glass"
pgsql-hackers by date: