On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 10:16:16AM +0000, Fujii.Yuki@df.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp wrote:
> 2. Approach 2
> (1) Advantages
> (a) No need to add partial aggregate functions to the catalogs for each aggregation
> (2) Disadvantages
> (a) Need to add non-standard keywords to the SQL syntax.
>
> I did not choose Approach2 because I was not confident that the disadvantage mentioned in 2.(2)(a)
> would be accepted by the PostgreSQL development community.
> If it is accepted, I think Approach 2 is smarter.
> Could you please provide your opinion on which
> approach is preferable after comparing these two approaches?
I didn't know #2 was possible, but given the great number of catalog
entries, doing it in the SQL grammar seems cleaner to me.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
