Re: bt_index_parent_check and concurrently build indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: bt_index_parent_check and concurrently build indexes
Date
Msg-id aD546ku49_7LsncZ@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bt_index_parent_check and concurrently build indexes  ("Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 02, 2025 at 05:40:18PM -0700, Donghang Lin wrote:
> Your finding is right on point! We recently used bt_index_parent_check to
> verify concurrently built indexes in a concurrent workload,
> bt_index_parent_check often gave such false positive error.

Good thing is that this is tracked in the CF app:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5438/

Peter, could you look at that?  amcheck and btree are both in your
area of expertise.  Getting this error because of routine CIC or
REINDEX CONCURRENTLY runs is annoying.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: pg18: Virtual generated columns are not (yet) safe when superuser selects from them
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Filter irrelevant change before reassemble transactions during logical decoding