On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 06:50:06PM +0800, Xuneng Zhou wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 11:16 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 12:07:01AM +0800, Xuneng Zhou wrote:
>> > Using a wrapper function seems better here.
>>
>> For a cleaner git history, the wrapper function and the assertion
>> should be split as its own commit, with the actual fix applied first.
>> Just an opinion.
>
> It makes sense to me. I've split the patch for HEAD into three patch
> sets. Please see the attached files.
Thanks, that looks sensible. I'll revisit what you have at the
beginning of next week (local Tuesday) with a backpatch down to v13 in
mind. If others have comments and/or objections, please feel free to
chime in.
Note that the changes in 040_standby_failover_slots_sync.pl are not
needed in v3-0001. No need to send an updated patch just for that.
--
Michael