On 8/31/23 12:52, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-08-31 at 10:59 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> The server's FDW has to be postgres_fdw. So we have to handle the
>> awkward dependency between core and postgres_fdw (an extension).
>
> That sounds more than just "awkward". I can't think of any precedent
> for that and it seems to violate the idea of an "extension" entirely.
>
> Can you explain more concretely how we might resolve that?
Maybe move postgres_fdw to be a first class built in feature instead of
an extension?
--
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
