On 2025/07/05 0:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> writes:
>> On 2025/07/04 16:29, Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) wrote:
>>> If more GUCs were found which cannot be set during the bootstrap mode, how about
>>> introducing a new flag like GUC_DEFAULT_WHILE_BOOTSTRAPPING for GUC variables?
>>> If the flag is set all setting can be ignored when
>>> IsBootstrapProcessingMode() = true.
>
>> If there are many GUCs that behave incorrectly during bootstrap,
>> a general mechanism like that might be worth considering. But if
>> only a few GUCs are affected, as I believe is the case,
>> then such a mechanism may be overkill.
>
> As I remarked in the other thread, I don't like inventing a different
> solution for each GUC. So if there are even two that need something
> done, I think Hayato-san's idea has merit.
>
> The core of the patch could be as little as
>
> diff --git a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
> index 667df448732..43f289924e6 100644
> --- a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
> +++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
> @@ -3464,6 +3464,15 @@ set_config_with_handle(const char *name, config_handle *handle,
> return 0;
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Certain GUCs aren't safe to enable during bootstrap mode. Silently
> + * ignore attempts to set them to non-default values.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(IsBootstrapProcessingMode()) &&
> + (record->flags & GUC_IGNORE_IN_BOOTSTRAP) &&
> + source != PGC_S_DEFAULT)
> + changeVal = false;
> +
> /*
> * Check if the option can be set at this time. See guc.h for the precise
> * rules.
This code seems to assume that the processing mode is switched to bootstrap before
GUC parameters are processed. But is that actually the case?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA Japan Corporation
