Re: Really dumb planner decision - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Matthew Wakeling
Subject Re: Really dumb planner decision
Date
Msg-id alpine.DEB.2.00.0904161259590.4053@aragorn.flymine.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Really dumb planner decision  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Really dumb planner decision
List pgsql-performance
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Robert Haas wrote:
> What happens if you change join_collapse_limit and from_collapse_limit
> to some huge number?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/runtime-config-query.html#GUC-FROM-COLLAPSE-LIMIT

That solves the problem. So, a view is treated as a subquery then?

Matthew

--
 Contrary to popular belief, Unix is user friendly. It just happens to be
 very selective about who its friends are.                 -- Kyle Hearn

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Really dumb planner decision
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Shouldn't the planner have a higher cost for reverse index scans?