On 7/1/25 19:20, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 06:45:37PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> On 7/1/25 18:34, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
>>
>> But isn't the _numa view good enough for this? Sure, you need NUMA
>> support for it, and it may take a fair amount of time, but how often you
>> need to do such queries?
>
> Not that often, but my reasoning was more like:
>
> why people managing engines and/or developing on platform that does not support
> libnuma would not deserve access to this information?
>
True. I always forget we only support libnuma on linux for now.
>> I don't plan to block improving this use case,
>
> No worries at all, I do appreciate that you're looking at it and provide feedback
> whatever the outcome would be.
>
>> but I'm not sure it's worth the effort.
>
> I think that the hard work has already been done while creating
> pg_buffercache_numa_pages().
>
> Now it's just a matter of extracting the necessary pieces from pg_buffercache_numa_pages()
> so that:
>
> * the new view could make use of it
> * the maintenance burden should be low (thanks to code dedeuplication)
> * people that don't have access to a platform that supports libnuma can have
> access to this information
>
+1
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
