Re: C11 / VS 2019 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: C11 / VS 2019
Date
Msg-id b58d60d3-b9af-4443-9a40-02f62002c3fa@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: C11 / VS 2019  (Yura Sokolov <y.sokolov@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 03.06.25 10:01, Yura Sokolov wrote:
> Will it mean we can implement atomics in term of C11 atomics?
> Aside for VS 2019, which has no support for. (But VS 2022 already has.)
> So instead of numerous variants we could just differ VS2019 vs plain C11.

I wrote:

"""
GCC details: The oldest gcc version that we currently need to support is 
gcc 4.8, which comes with RHEL 7.  As alluded to above, some C11 
features came later with gcc 4.9, specifically generic, threads, and 
atomics.  I think it would still be useful to move forward without those 
features.
"""

So there is additional homework to do there.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: C11 / VS 2019
Next
From: Japin Li
Date:
Subject: pg_probackup build issue with PostgreSQL 18beta1 due to pg_detoast_datum_packed()