Hi Amul,
On 09/28/2017 05:56 AM, amul sul wrote:
> It does not really do the partition pruning via constraint exclusion and I don't
> think anyone is going to use the remainder in the where condition to fetch
> data and hash partitioning is not meant for that.
>
> But I am sure that we could solve this problem using your and Beena's work
> toward faster partition pruning[1] and Runtime Partition Pruning[2].
>
> Will think on this changes if it is required for the pruning feature.
>
Could you rebase on latest master ?
Best regards, Jesper
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
